The use of fiction cinema as a methodological tool for social research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18764/2447-6498v12n1e29878Keywords:
cinema, culture, visual anthropology, interdisciplinarityAbstract
Using fiction cinema for social research can give rise to skepticism precisely because of the invented nature inherent in the structure of cinematic works. However, a work of fiction is not autonomous from the social world; it reflects the culture in which it was produced and serves
as a mode of cultural expression. Insights from image analysis, visual anthropology, and film analysis have provided relevant perspectives that allow us to contribute to the debate regarding the rigor and feasibility of conducting social research through fiction films. Given the increasingly pervasive presence of images in our society, it is crucial to reflect on the relationship between image, society, and knowledge in order to consider how these works are
received and their effects on two levels: 1) as a representation of culture; and 2) as an expression of culture itself. Thus, tactics and strategies are outlined to ensure that the analysis of fiction films meets the necessary standards of rigor to be considered a valid field for analyzing the social world. In this context, "iconic pacts" are essential for stabilizing senses and meanings, preventing interpretations from becoming overly subjective—whether due to a viewer's specific life experiences or a reliance on the author's or director's original desires or intentions. Furthermore, analyzing fiction films can be a vital strategy for accessing dimensions of the social world that are difficult to reach through more traditional interventionist research methods—specifically, the realm of the imaginary or highly private aspects of social life shaped by taboo subjects or tensions arising from prevailing moral
norms. In such cases, an analysis of expression that goes beyond mere narrative structure—reintegrating that structure into the plane of immanence—offers the inventiveness needed to engage with social dimensions that exist but pose challenges for traditional research
approaches.
Downloads
References
COSTA, Cristina. Sociologia: Introdução à Ciência da Sociedade. São Paulo: Moderna, 2005.
ROSENFELD, Anaton. O pensamento psicológico. São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva, 2013.
DUARTE, Rosália. Cinema & Educação. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2002.
JENKINS, Henri. The workoftheory in the age of digital transformation.In:MILLER, Toby; STAM, Robert. A companiontofilmtheory. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher, 2003. pp. 234- 261.
CANEVACCI, Massimo. Antropologia da comunicação visual. Rio de Janeiro: Dp&a, 2001.
PASSERON, Jean-claude. O raciocínio sociológico: o espaço não popperiano do raciocínio natural. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1995.
THOMPSON, John B. Ideologia e Cultura Moderna: teoria social crítica na era dos meios de comunicação em massa. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 1995.
VANOYE, Francis; GOLIOT-LÈTÈ, Anne. Ensaio sobre análise fílmica. Campinas: Papirus, 2002.
SILVA, Igor Monteiro. Honra e Sangue: A (po)ética da Vingança no Sertão de Abril Despedaçado. Fortaleza: Expressão Gráfica Editora, 2011.
CHIOZZI, P. (Ed.). Yearbookof visual anthropology: 1942-1992 Fifty yearsafter "Balinese Character". Firenze: AngeloPontecorboli, 1993.
RIBEIRO, José da Silva; BAIRON, Sérgio (Orgs. E Coords.) Antropologia visual e hipermídia. Porto: Edições Afrontamento, 2007.
JOLY, Martine. Introdução à análise da imagem. Campinas: Papirus, 1996.
FRIDMAN, Luis Carlos. Vertigens pós-modernas: configurações institucionais contemporâneas. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará, 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Esta licença permite que outros distribuam, remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do seu trabalho, mesmo para fins comerciais, desde que lhe atribuam o devido crédito pela criação original.











