TECHNICAL FISHERY INTERACTIONS IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL

Autores

  • Flávia Lucena Universidade Federal do Pará-UFPA
  • Carl Michael O’Brien CEFAS Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 OHT, UK
  • Thierry Frédou Université de la Méditerranée, Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille, UMR: 6540 13288 Marseille cedex 9, France.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18764/

Palavras-chave:

fishery, southern Brazil, technical interactions

Resumo

Technical interactions arise through the incidental catch of non-target species (by-catch) in targeted fisheries and by the co-existence of fleets exploiting the same resource. This study revises the fishery, gears and species captured in southern Brazil and also identifies the technical interactions between the fleets and the species involved (through mixed catch and by-catch), especially of the bluefish, Pomatomus saltatrix, and the striped weakfish, Cynoscion guatucupa. Data was taken from published material about the southern Brazilian continental shelf fishery, catch records from coastal landing sites, interviews with skippers and managers and data collected by the IBAMA (Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis). The demersal teleosts are the most exploited resources, notably the Sciaenids Micropogonias furnieri, C. guatucupa, Umbrina canosai and Macrodon ancylodon (55% in weight). The higher proportion of by-catch of the targeted P. saltatrix by gill netting is due to Brevoortia pectinata and Parona signata. The targeted C. guatucupa by gill netting is more species-diverse. M. furnieri gill netting is very species-selective as only 4% on average of the total catch is regarded as incidental. Trawlers may catch up to 20 species and there is no specific target species. Purse seine is a species-specific gear as, for most of the targeted species, the by-catch is less than 1% by weight. The size range of the exploited P. saltatrix and C. guatucupa differs amongst gears.

 

RESUMO

Interações técnicas na atividade pesqueira do sul do Brasil

Interações técnicas estão relacionadas com a captura incidental de espécies não alvo (fauna acompanhante) em pescarias direcionadas e, pela co-existência de frotas explorando o mesmo recurso. Este estudo revisa a pesca, artes de pesca e espécies capturadas no sul do Brasil e também identifica as interações técnicas entre frotas e espécies (através da captura mista ou fauna acompanhante), especialmente para a anchova, Pomatomus saltatrix, e pescada olhuda, Cynoscion guatucupa. Os dados foram obtidos através de material publicado sobre a pesca da plataforma continetal do sul do Brasil, registros de pesca dos pontos de desembarque da pesca costeira, entrevista com mestres e armadores de barcos e dados coletados pelo IBAMA. Teleósteos demersais são os recursos mais explorados, principalmente os Sciaenídeos Micropogonias furnieri, C. guatucupa, Umbrina canosai e Macrodon ancylodon (55% em peso). A maior proporção da fauna acompanhante da pescaria de rede de emalhe direcionada para o P. saltatrix são das espécies Brevoortia pectinata e Parona signata. A pesca de emalhe direcionada para C. guatucupa é mais diversificada. A pesca de emalhe direcionada para M. furnieri é muito seletiva em termos de número de espécies uma vez que apenas 4% em media da captura total é incidental. Arrasteiros podem capturar até 20 diferentes espécies e não há uma espécie-alvo específica. Rede de cerco é uma arte específica uma vez que, para a maioria das espécies-alvo, a fauna acompanhante é menor que 1% em peso. A faixa de comprimento do P. saltatrix and C. guatucupa explorado difere entre as artes de pesca.

Palavras chave: pesca, sul do Brasil, interações técnicas.

 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Flávia Lucena, Universidade Federal do Pará-UFPA

Departamento de Oceanografia, Centro de Geociências

Referências

ALDEBERT, Y., RECASENS, L. & LLEONART, J. 1993. Analysis of gear interactions in a hake fishery: the case of the Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean). Sci. Mar., 57(2-3): 207-217.

ALVERSON, D.L., FREEBERG, L.G., MURAWSKI, S.A. & POPE, J.G. 1994. A global assessment of fisheries by-catch. FAO Fish. Tech. Paper, 339: 233p.

ALVERSON, D.L. & HUGHES, S.E. 1996. Bycatch: from emotion to effective natural resource management. Rev. Fish and Biol. Fish., 6: 443-462.

ANDERSON, L.G. 1986. The economics of fisheries management. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

BOFFO, M. & REIS, E.G. 1997. Estrutura da pesca artesanal costeira no extremo sul do Brasil.VII Congresso Latino-Americano de Ciencias del Mar, Mar del Plata, 88-90.

CHARLES, A.T. & REED, W. 1985. A bioeconomic analysis of sequential fisheries: competition, coexistence, and optimum harvest allocation between inshore and offshore fleets. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42: 952-962.

CORDO, H.D. 1986. Estudios biologicos sobre peces costeros con datos de dos campanas de investigacion realizadas en 1981. III la pescadilla de red (Cynoscion striatus). Publ. Com Téc. Mix. Fr. Mar., 1(1): 15-27.

DANN, N. 1987. Multispecies versus single-species assessment of North Sea fish stocks. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 44: 360-370.

DULVY, N. K., METCALFE, J.D., GLANVILLE, J., PAWSON, M.G. & REYNOLDS, J.D. 2000. Fishery stability, local extinctions, and shifts in community structure in rays. Cons. Biol., 14 (1): 283 - 293.

EIDE, A. & FLAATEN, O. 1998. Bioeconomic multispecies models of the Barents Sea fisheries. In: Rodseth, T., ed, Models for multispecies management, Springer-Velag, Heidelberg. 141-172.

HAIMOVICI, M. & MENDONÇA, J.T. 1996. Descartes da fauma acompanhante na pesca de arrasto de tangones dirigida a linguados e camarões na plataforma continental do sul do Brasil. Atlântica, 18: 161-178.

HAIMOVICI, M. 1998. Present state and perspectives for the southern Brazil shelf demersal fisheries. Fish. Man. Ecol., 5: 277-289.

HILBORN, R. & WATERS, C.J. 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment. Choice, dynamics and uncertainty. New York: Chapman and Hall. 570 p.

HUDSON, E. & MACE, G. 1996. Marine fish and the IUCN red list of threatened animals. London: Zoological Society of London.

LUCENA, F.M. & REIS, E.G. 1998. Estrutura e estratégia de pesca da anchova Pomatomus saltatrix (Pisces: Pomatomidae) na costa do Rio Grande do Sul. Atlântica, 20: 87-103.

LUCENA, F.M. 2000. Species interaction in fish stock assessment and management in southern Brazil: a bio-economic approach. PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, 235p.

LUCENA, F.M., VASKE JR, T. ELLIS, J.R. & O’BRIEN, C.M. 2000a. Seasonal variation in the diets of bluefish Pomatomus saltatrix (Pomatomidae) and striped weakfish Cynoscion guatucupa (Sciaenidae) in southern Brazil: implications of food partitioning. Env. Biol. Fish., 57(4): 423-434.

LUCENA, F.M., O’BRIEN, C.M., & REIS, E.G. 2000b. The effect of fish morphology and behaviour on the efficiency of gill nets, their selectity and by-catch: two examples from southern Brazil. ICES, CM J 11, 2000.

LUCENA, F.M., C.M. O’BRIEN & E.G. REIS. 2002. Effects of exploitation by two co-existing fleets on the bluefish Pomatomus saltatrix in southern Brazil: application of a seasonal catch-at-age model. Mar. Fresh. Res., 56: 1-13.

MCCOMBIE, A.M. & BERST, A.H. 1969. Some effects of shape and structure of fish on selectivity of gillnets. J. Fish. Res. B. Can., 26: 2681-2689.

O’ BOYLE, R.N., SINCLAIR, A.F. & HURLEY, P.C.F. 1991. A bioeconomic model of an age-structured groundfish resource exploited by a multi-gear fishing fleet. ICES Mar. Sci. Symp., 193: 264-274.

PASCOE, S. 2000. Economic incentives to discard in unregulated and individual transferable quotas fisheries In: Kaiser, M.J. & de Groot, S.J., eds, The effects of fishing on non-target species and habitat. Biological, conservation and socio-economic issue, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 315-331.

PIKITCH, E.K. 1988. Objectives for biologically and technically interrelated fisheries In: Woodter, W.S., ed. Fisheries Science and management: Objectives and limitations, Springer-Verlag, New York, 107-136.

REIS, E.G. 1992. An assessment of the exploitation of the white croaker Micropogonias furnieri (Pisces, Scianidae) by the artisanal and industrial fisheries in coastal waters of southern Brazil. PhD, University of East Anglia.

REIS, E.G. & PAWSON, M.G. 1999. Fish morphology and estimating selectivity by gill nets. Fish. Res., 39: 263-273.

TJELMELAND, S. & BOGSTAD, B. 1998. Biological modelling. In: Rodseth, T., ed., Models for multispecies management. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag: 69-92.

VAN MARLEN, B. 1993. Research on improving the species selectivity of bottom trawls in the Netherlands. In: Wardle, C.S. & Holligworth, C.E., eds., Fish behaviour in relation to fishing operation, Bergen, 196: 165-169.

WILK, S.J. 1977. Biological & fisheries data on bluefish, Pomatomus saltatrix (Linnaeus). NOAA Tech. Ser. Rep.,

: 1-56.

Downloads

Como Citar

(1)
Lucena, F.; O’Brien, C. M.; Frédou, T. TECHNICAL FISHERY INTERACTIONS IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL. Bol. Lab. Hidrobiol. 2014, 14.

Edição

Seção

Artigos